[THS] Gilad Atzmon: Connecting the Zionist Dots

[The Harder Stuff in news and commentary]

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25805.htm

Connecting the Zionist Dots

By Gilad Atzmon

June 24, 2010 "Information Clearing House" -- A few  weeks ago the Jewish Chronicle
published a list of Jewish MPs in the UK parliament. It named 24 in total,
encompassing 12 Conservatives, 10 Labour, and two Liberal Democrats. Author and
peace activist  Stuart Littlewood elaborated on these figures and presented the
following analysis:

“The Jewish population in the UK is 280,000 or 0.46 per cent. There are 650 seats in
the House of Commons so, as a proportion, Jewish entitlement is only three seats.
The conclusion is pretty obvious. With 24 seats, Jews are eight times over-
represented. Which means, of course, that other groups must be under-represented,
including Muslims
If Muslims, for instance,  were over-represented to the same
extent as the Jews (i.e. eight times) they’d have 200 seats. All hell would break
loose.”

A question must be raised here. Why are Jews overwhelmingly over-represented in
the British parliament, in British and American political pressure groups, in political
fundraising and in the media?

Haim Saban, the Israeli-American, multibillionaire media mogul offers the answer.
The New Yorker reported  this week that at a conference last fall, Saban described
his pro-Israeli formula, outlining “three ways to be influential in American
politics
make donations to political parties, establish think tanks, and control media
outlets.”

As I have mentioned many times before, there is no such a thing as Jewish
conspiracy. It is all done in the open. In front of TV cameras from all over the world,
listed Israeli Propaganda Author as well as British Foreign Secretary  David Miliband
gave the Israelis a green light to operation Cast Lead, suggesting in Sderot that
“Israel should, above all, seek to protect its own citizens.” Miliband, in practice, made
us all complicit in a colossal war crime committed by Israel.  Staunch Zionist Lord
Levy funded the Labour party when this party launched a criminal war that intended
to erase the last pocket of Arabic resistance to Zionism. He also wasn’t at all shy
about it. In the media, shameless Jewish Chronicle writers David Aaronovitch and
Nick Cohen enthusiastically advocated the same criminal war in the name of ‘moral
interventionism’.  Nick Cohen also founded the Euston Manifesto ‘think tank’ to
support dubious Neocon ideologies on this side of the pond.

Levy, Cohen, Aaronovitch, Miliband are all in line with Saban’s formula: influence,
donations, think tanks, media. Yet they don’t necessarily know Saban, and may never
even have heard about the Zionist media mogul. It isn’t necessary. The fact is, Saban
didn’t invent anything himself. His formula is deeply brewed in the Judaic religious
tradition, Jewish culture and ideology.

United Against Purim

The Book of Esther is a biblical story that is the basis for the celebration of Purim, the
most joyous Jewish festival. The book tells the story of an attempted Judeocide, but it
also tells a story in which Jews manage to change their fate by means of political
influence. In the story, the Jews do manage to rescue themselves and even to mete
revenge, all through an infiltration into the corridors of power.

It is set in the third year of Ahasuerus, and the ruler is a king of Persia usually
identified with Xerxes I. It is the story of a palace, a conspiracy, an attempted
Judeocide and a brave and beautiful Jewish queen (Esther) who manages to save
the Jewish people at the very last minute.

In the story, King Ahasuerus is married to Vashti, whom he repudiates after she
rejects his offer to 'visit' him during a feast. Esther was selected from the candidates
to be Ahasuerus's new wife. As the story progresses, Ahasuerus's Prime Minister
Haman plots to have the king kill all the Jews without knowing that Esther is actually
Jewish. Esther, together with her cousin Mordechai saves the day for their people.
Esther warns Ahasuerus of Haman's murderous anti-Jewish plot. Haman and his sons
are hanged on the fifty cubit gallows he had originally built for cousin Mordechai. As
it happens, Mordechai takes Haman's place, becoming the Prime Minister.
Ahasuerus's edict decreeing the murder of the Jews cannot be rescinded, so he
issues another edict allowing the Jews to take up arms and kill their enemies, which
they obviously do.

The moral of the Biblical story is rather clear. If Jews want to survive, they had better
make their way into the corridors of power. They had better bond to the rulers of the
world. With Esther, Mordechai and Purim in mind, AIPAC, Levy, ADL, David Milliband,
Saban and the notion of 'Jewish power' all appear to be an embodiment of a deep
Biblical, tribal and cultural ideology.

However, here is the interesting twist. Although the story is presented as an historic
tale, the historical accuracy of the Book of Esther is largely disputed by most modern
Bible acholars and historians.  The lack of any clear corroboration of between any of
the details of the story with what is known of Persian History from classical sources is
what has led scholars to come to the conclusion that the story is mostly, or even
totally fictional.

In other words, though the Jewish moral is clear, the attempted genocide is fictional.
Seemingly, the Book of Esther sets its (Jewish) followers into a collective Pre-
Traumatic Stress Disorder. It transforms a fictional fantasy of ‘destruction’ into a vivid
‘ideology of survival’. And indeed, some read the story as an allegory of
quintessentially assimilated Jews who discover that they are targets of anti-Semitism,
but are also in a position to save themselves and their fellow Jews.

The Book of Esther exists to form a coherent exilic tribal identity. It is there to plant
an existential stress. It introduces the Holocaust mentality. Furthermore, it fixes the
conditions which turn the Holocaust into reality. In hermeneutic terms, the text
shapes the reality. In practice, it is the fearful mind the sets itself into a tragic trap of
self-fulfilling  prophecy. The Shoa ideology matures into a real event.

Interestingly enough, the Book of Esther (in the Hebrew version) is one of only two
books of the Bible that do not directly mention God (the other is Song of Songs). As
in the case of Zionist secular ideology and the Holocaust religion, in the Book of
Esther it is the Jews who believe in themselves, in their own power, in their
uniqueness, in their sophistication, in their ability to influence, in their ability to take
over kingdoms, and in their ability to save themselves. The Book of Esther is all about
empowerment. It conveys the essence and metaphysics of Jewish power, as
described by Haim Saban and performed by AIPAC.

Zionism and Democracy

Zionists seem to love democracy. The Jewish state outrageously claims to be ‘the only
democracy in the Middle East’. Israel’s supporters around the world also advocate
conflicts in the name of ‘democracy’. Why do they love democracy so much? I guess
that the answer is devastatingly simple. Democracy is the ideal political platform for
the Zionist influence merchant.

Democracy in its current state, especially within the English-Speaking world, is a
political system that specializes in positioning inadequate, unqualified and dubious
characters in leading positions. Two democratically elected leaders launched the
illegal war in Iraq. Two democratically elected leaders marched the west into a
financial disaster.

Running a state is not an easy task. It surely takes some talent and training. In the
past, our elected political leaders were experienced politicians who had achieved
something in their lives, whether in academia, industry, military or the financial
world. In the past, our candidates for premiership had a curriculum vitae to share
with us.  Apparently this is not the case anymore. Time after time we are left with a
‘democratic choice’ to give our vote to one or another laughable young failure.  Time
after time we see rising political ‘stars’, people have really achieved nothing in their
lives, and who are unqualified to run even a corner shop, let alone a state.

You may want to ask yourself what qualification Blair or Bush possessed before they
took the wheel in their hands. What experience does David Cameron have at his
disposal in order to rescue Britain from total disaster on every possible front
(financial, Iraq, Afghanistan, education, NHS and so on)? What kind of experience
does David Miliband bring with him in the bid for the Labour premiership?  The
answer is none. Our lives, our future and the future of our children are in the hands
of ludicrous, clueless characters.   This may explain why Britain ended up with a
hung Parliament. Not a single leader in this country could convince the public that he
had the talent, the integrity or even just a seed of true leadership.

But here is the news. As much as our elected leaders are totally clueless, the Sabans,
the Lord Levys and the Wolfowitzes know exactly what to do. The Jewish religion,
culture and ideology provides its followers with a narrative that saves us of the
democratic limbo. The Sabans of this world are far from being amateurs or clueless;
they know exactly what to do. They have been doing it for three thousand years.
They are the followers of Mordechai and Esther. The Sabans of the world know how
to translate the moral of Purim into British and American practice.

Stuart Littlewood seems to wonder why Jews are over-represented. With Purim in
mind, we may be able to suggest an answer. We are dealing here with an exilic
cultural setting that preaches for lobbing, influence and control. Shaping politics,
media and thoughts is the true meaning of the Book of Esther. Saban was either just
genuine or foolish enough to admit it in public. However, the absence of a Book of
Esther within the heart of Muslim or Hindu culture may explain why other marginal
migrant groups in Britain are adequately and proportionally represented in British
politics and media. Moreover, it is unlikely that this will change soon.  As opposed to
most minorities and marginal identities in the West, Judaism is an exilic national
religion and the Jewish identity is a product of tribal indoctrination. This may explain
why emancipated Jews who live in Britain for generations as seculars still operate
within Jewish political and social settings, and under Jewish political banners.

It is not a secret that a few Jews out there are very gifted. It is also rather obvious
that some Jews are amongst the leading contributors to the humanist and universal
discourse. However, this is not something we can say about Haim Saban, who openly
desires to influence American foreign policy by means of donations, think tanks and
media control. Similarly, David Milliband, who struggled to amend British universal
Jurisdiction to make it easy for Israeli war criminal visit his kingdom, should not be
regarded as a great  humanist either. Nick Cohen, who founded the Euston
Manifesto, a think tank that promotes Zionist interests within British intellectual
culture, cannot be regarded as an ethical icon. Amazingly enough, they all did it in
the open.

If we care about peace and about our future generations, we must be brave enough
to connect the dots. The Mordechais and Esthers within our media, intellectual and
political life must be confronted. We must unite against Purim. If the Labour party still
carries any ethical responsibility, it should put David Milliband in his place. If our
parties want us to believe in their agendas, they had better learn to say “NO” to
Zionist money and Jewish proxy donators. If our media outlets want us to believe in
their ‘impartiality’, they had better identify the enemy within. How many Iraqis will
need to die before the penny drops? How many peace activist should die in high seas
before we all say ‘NO more’?  How many British workers will need to lose their jobs,
homes and hopes before we can allow ourselves to say “NO” to Zionist wars and their
advocates in our midst?