[THS] IDF Released Several Faked Photos

[The Harder Stuff in news and commentary]

http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/52394

IDF Released Several Faked Photos – How Can They Be Trusted in ANY Investigation?
By: EdwardTeller Wednesday June 2, 2010 1:28 pm

Proof has surfaced today that many of the so-called "evidence" photographs being
distributed by the Israeli government as examples of terror weapons on board the
Gaza aid flotilla date back years:

The bulletproof vest photos on the Israeli flickr page are dated February 2006.

The axe photo was taken in 2003.

The pepper spray photos – 2003

The iconic pictures of knives and other weapons on the Saudi flag and other stuff:

    Hi. Just to confirm that the EXIF metadata points to this photo being taken in
2006:
    barney at benchwood:~$ identify -verbose
farm5.static.flickr.com/4047/4662965686_a91f8 bab2e_o_d.jpg | grep Date
    exif:DateTime: 2010:06:02 10:38:47
    exif:DateTimeDigitized: 2006:02:07 05:52:19
    exif:DateTimeOriginal: 2006:02:07 05:52:19

And on and on
..

Absolutely, this is strong evidence that by allowing the Israeli government to be
trusted in any aspect of the investigation of these high seas crimes will be foolhardy
and negligent.

The most recent evidence we have of how the Israeli government deals with crime
scenes where American lives have been put in jeopardy is in the ongoing civil suit
brought by Rachel Corrie’s family against the Israeli government. Testimony will
resume some time – or not. The Israeli government is trying to stop the trial. But so
far, here’s some of what has come out that reflects on the ability of the Israeli
government or military to conduct honest investigations:

    March 24: Military investigator testifies that head of IDF Southern Command
instructed bulldozer operator not to cooperate with investigation.

    March 15: Eye Witness Testifies: Israeli Military Investigator Tried to Influence My
Statement.

    March 14: Autopsy doctor admits to violating court order in Rachel Corrie autopsy.

Essentially, aspects of IDF conduct involving their handling of the death of Corrie
clearly violate Israeli law, and call for trial, possible conviction and imprisonment of all
officers involved:

    But now evidence has emerged in the civil suit that Israel’s then Gaza commander
obstructed the military police investigation into the circumstances surrounding the
death.

    The apparent intervention of Major-General Doron Almog, then head of Israel’s
southern command, is documented in testimony taken by Israeli military police from
the commander of the bulldozer a day after Ms Corrie was killed.

    The handwritten affidavit effectively puts the entire state of Israel on trial. Is it
willing to tolerate Maj-Gen Almog’s gross interference in the investigation or will it
hold him to the three years’ imprisonment the law accords for such an offence?

    In the affidavit, the commander of the D-9 tells military police investigators that he
did not see Ms Corrie before she was wounded.

    However, Alice Coy, now a nurse in Glasgow, and an ISM volunteer activist who
was near Ms Corrie during the incident, said in an affidavit to the court that “to the
best of my knowledge the bulldozer driver could see Rachel while pushing earth over
her body”.

    The D-9 commander, a reservist named Edward Valermov, was in the middle of
his testimony when a colonel dispatched by Maj-Gen Almog entered the room and
ordered him to stop speaking, according to the document.

    The military police investigator wrote: “At 18:12 reserve Colonel Baruch Kirhatu
entered the room and informed the witness that he should not convey anything and
should not write anything and this at the order of the general of southern
command.”

    In his testimony before he was stopped, Mr Valermov said that the bulldozers,
manned by two people, were ordered by their company commander to continue their
work despite the presence of the ISM protesters.

    He said that troops in an armoured personnel carrier threw stun grenades, used
tear gas and fired shots toward the ground in order to scare the protesters away.

    “It didn’t help and therefore we decided to continue the work with all possible
delicateness on the orders of the company commander,” he added.

    Mr Valermov testified that the protesters nearly touched the bulldozers, making it
impossible to advance, but that after the company commander’s order “we started
moving with the D-9, we continued laying bare the area from all of the things that
were there.

    “It was only when we moved the D-9 backwards that I saw her. The woman was
lying in a place where the instrument had not reached. As soon as we saw the
harmed woman we returned to the central corridor, stood and waited for orders.”

    Mr Valermov’s last statement before Maj-Gen Almog’s interdiction was, “my job
was to guide. The driver cannot guide himself because his field of vision is not large.”

    In a phone interview from Olympia, Washington, Rachel’s father Craig Corrie
termed Maj-Gen Almog’s intervention in Mr Valermov’s testimony “outrageous”.

    Maj-Gen Almog has angrily denied halting Mr Valermov’s testimony.

    Moshe Negbi, legal commentator for the state-run Voice of Israel radio, said of
Maj-Gen Almog’s interdiction: “If a commander prevents a witness from testifying
than it is disruption of an investigation, a criminal offence whose penalty is three
years’ imprisonment.”

    By deciding Maj-Gen Almog’s fate, Israel will be deciding if it is a state of law or a
state of the generals – past and present.

Anyone who thinks the officers involved in the Corrie coverup will be held
accountable is a fool. Anyone who thinks that the Israeli government will conduct an
impartial investigation of Sunday morning’s tragedy is even more foolish, especially in
light of mounting evidence that the Israelis are already disseminating totally false
images as examples of some sort of forensic evidence.

It is time to put pressure on our government to demand the truth, rather than accept
criminally motivated bullshit and lies.