[THS] !!!!! Wikileaks Video Revisited: What Needs To Happen Now

[The Harder Stuff in news and commentary]

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25296.htm

Wikileaks Video Revisited: What Needs To Happen Now

By Dan Froomkin

April 22, 2010 "Huffington Post" -- Earlier this month, the whistleblower website
WikiLeaks released a deeply disturbing video of a U.S. Army Apache helicopter in
Baghdad in 2007 repeatedly machine-gunning a group of men that included a
Reuters photographer and his driver -- and then opening fire on a van that stopped
to rescue one of the wounded men. (Here's my article about it
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/05/wikileaks-exposes-video-o_n_525569.html )

The two Reuters employees were killed. But Reuters, which had been asking to see
the video for two and a half years, didn't have much to say right away.

Today, Reuters editor-in-chief David Schlesinger is out with an opinion column
entitled "What I want from the Pentagon". His central point: "What I want from the
Pentagon -- and from all militaries -- is simple: Acknowledgment, transparency,
accountability." Here he is on the accountability part:

    Let's dig behind the video. Let's fully understand the rules the military were
operating under. Let's have a complete picture of what was going through the fliers'
minds. Let's hear the Pentagon explain its interpretation of the rules of engagement
and the Geneva Convention and how the actions either did or did not accord with
them in its view. And importantly, let's keep in mind that while we focus on this
particular tragedy, it is the rare circumstance that when a journalist is injured or
killed in a conflict area, there is a video of the death, and even more rare as this case
demonstrates, for the public to see such a video.

I totally agree. I want what he wants. And here's something else I want.

I want someone on Capitol Hill to give a shit.

So far (and I've done a bit of calling around) I haven't heard any member of
Congress express any intention of holding an oversight hearing into the matter -- or
even asking any questions at all.

They seem utterly uncurious about how exactly it was OK for a bloodthirsty-sounding
helicopter crewman to open fire on a group of (apparently) armed men when all they
were doing was milling around on a street corner -- not to mention how it was OK to
target the Good Samaritan van driver who pulled over to help one of the injured
men. (He was killed; his two small children were wounded.)

Even more than that, to be perfectly honest, I want someone on Capitol Hill to give a
shit about the gruesome cover-up by U.S. forces in Afghanistan after they massacred
five innocent civilians, including three women, two of whom were pregnant -- just
this past February. Just not on video (as far as we know).

In case you missed it, the very same morning the WikiLeaks video was released, the
New York Times confirmed reports by heroic Times of London correspondent Jerome
Starkey that American Special Operations soldiers actually dug their bullets out of the
bodies of the women as part of a cover-up. NATO headquarters, led by Gen. Stanley
McChrystal, then backed them up and repeatedly tried to discredit Starkey and his
story.

Is that standard operating procedure? Again, I haven't heard a peep of interest from
the Hill -- despite the fact that Starkey himself has argued that it was not an isolated
incident, and that U.S. and NATO forces are rarely held to account for the atrocities
they commit.

Where's the outrage? Where's the responsibility? Where's the oversight? Hell, where's
the basic curiosity? Has anyone on the Hill even asked any questions of the Pentagon
or the White House? Hey, President Obama, are you OK with this?

Does your member of Congress give a shit?

Call them and let me know what you find out. froomkin at huffingtonpost.com.


WATCH the WikiLeaks video: